Tuesday plagiarism bashing

Under the wonderful post title “Copyright Infringement And A Medieval Apple Pie”, the blogger Jane Smith (not her real name, one would guess) has documented the history of an online copyright infringement. Hardly unusual, you would think, indeed the internet is supposed to be not only rife with plagiarism, but host to vociferous defenders of the practice.

However the person committing the infraction, one Judith Griggs, has been subjected to the modern equivalent of the mediaeval punishment of being thrown into stocks and pummelled with garbage in the town square. In this case it was a viral and vicious Facebook and Twitter campaign accompanied by calls for a “Googlebombing”, which Wikipedia defines as “practices intended to influence the ranking of particular pages in results returned by the Google search engine”.

Judith Griggs did seem somewhat unbelievably naïve and self serving in her attitude, pretty irritating one might say, but not perhaps entirely deserving of the massive backlash against her. Fortunately for the offending author, after venting their collective spleens, bloggers, commenters, twitterers and the like eased up, and the general discourse turned into something humorous.

What I found interesting however was that the whole campaign was not only the opposite of the open source community stereotype of borrowings, mashups and samplings, but despite frequent invocations of the law of copyright by the hunting pack, there seems to have been only one person who actually threatened legal action. All the rest was entirely the old fashioned coercion of social opprobrium and shame, which writers like Thomas Scheff,* (who is an intellectual descendant of Norbert Elias) find so fundamental to social control.
*Scheff, Thomas J. 2000. Shame and the Social Bond: A Sociological Theory. Sociological Theory 18, no. 1 (March): 84 – 99. doi:10.1111/0735-2751.00089.

This entry was posted in IT and Internet, Society, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Tuesday plagiarism bashing

  1. Paul Frijters says:

    nice to hear that Norbert Elias, who lived for a while in Amsterdam and constituted a great example of a sincere attempt to get at really difficult phenomena, is still read somewhere. His thoughts never made it in economics, which is a pity.

  2. Julia says:

    Elias is a great example of unrecognised influence. His attempt to resolve the “structure / agency” debate with his elegant “figurations” influenced Bourdieu’s “Habitus” and his discussions of shame and social self control were picked up by Foucault without a great deal of acknowledgement.
    Somewhere in his structure/ agency stuff he talks about how hard it is to tell the dancer from the dance, thus also anticipating The Eagles lyric by a few decades. (“Whatever happened to Saturday night?”)

  3. Jacques Chester says:

    What I found interesting however was that the whole campaign was not only the opposite of the open source community stereotype of borrowings, mashups and samplings …

    Perhaps you meant Creative Commons. “Open source” is really best applied to software.

    In either case, though, the borrowing, mashing and sampling begins with an explicit license granting permission.

  4. Jane Smith says:

    Thank you for linking to my blog and yes, Jane Smith IS my real name!

    In an effort to bring something positive out of this whole mess, some friends and I are blogging about copyright and trying to be constructive. Do join in if you can; leave a link to it in the comments thread here, so everyone can find your piece.

    http://howpublishingreallyworks.com/?p=3500

    Thankyou.

    Jane Smith
    (really)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *